Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Doe v. City of Boston: Title VII Retaliation Requires But-For Causation and Decisionmaker Knowledge; Authorized or Legally Compelled Record Disclosures Do Not Suffice Absent Evidence of Deviation I....
Corroborated Hearsay + Marital Privilege as “Interest of Justice” Good Cause Under Rule 32.1(b)(2)(C) in Supervised-Release Revocations Case: United States v. Camillo (No. 25-1472) | Court: U.S....
Post-Rahimi Constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) and the Irrelevance of “I Thought It Was Legal” Evidence Under Rehaif Commentary on United States v. Minor, U.S. Court of Appeals for the First...
Massachusetts “Open and Gross Lewdness” (§ 16) Is Not a CIMT Absent a Lewd (Sexual) Intent Element Introduction In Cabral Fortes Tomar v. Bondi (1st Cir. Jan. 23, 2026), the First Circuit reviewed a...
Particularized Pleading of Injury Required for Article III Standing in Zoning-Overlay Challenges (Abutter and Town-Meeting Voter Status Insufficient) 1. Introduction In Kolackovsky v. Town of...
Federal Sovereign Immunity Bars FCA § 3730(h) Retaliation Suits Against Federal Employers Introduction In UNITED STATES, ex rel. ERIK K. SARGENT v. DOUGLAS A. COLLINS (1st Cir. Jan. 22, 2026), the...
Title VI Does Not Compel Universities to Suppress Protected Political Speech, and Campus Liability Turns on Deliberate Indifference Introduction StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v. MIT returns to...
United States v. Papantoniadis — Forced Labor Under § 1589 May Be Proven Through a Workplace-Wide Climate of Fear (Including Threatened Deportation) and Contextual Evidence Beyond the Named Victim...
Mongue v. The Wheatleigh Corporation: Rule 23(e) Allows Approval of a “Global” Settlement Negotiated by Counsel Representing Both a Class and Individual Plaintiffs Absent a Realized Conflict...
Upward Variances for Firearms “Firepower” Beyond the Guidelines and No Plea Breach When Government Defends the Sentence on Appeal I. Introduction In United States v. Maldonado-Velazquez (1st Cir....
Government-Issued License Plates as “Goods” Under the Lanham Act and the Survival of Personal-Capacity Trademark Claims Against Puerto Rico Officials 1. Introduction Clemente Properties, Inc. v....
U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 Upward Variances: Large Ammunition Quantities and Multiple (High-Capacity) Magazines as “Heartland” Aggravators, with Sentencing Rationale Inferable from the Record I. Introduction...
Large Ammunition Quantity and Multiple (High-Capacity) Magazines Can Independently Justify an Upward Variance When the Guidelines Do Not Account for That Quantity 1. Introduction In United States v....
Expert-Testimony Gatekeeping for Negligence/IIED Claims Challenging Mandated Child-Abuse Reporting; Evidence of Actual Service Denial Required for Section 504 Case: J.S.H. v. Newton Court: United...
Time-Limited, Health-Furthering Medical Exemptions Do Not Defeat General Applicability of COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates (and Reply-Brief Individualized-Exemption Theories Are Waived) Case: Brox v. Woods...
Reliance-Interest Review and the Limits of Post Hoc Declarations in APA Stay Motions: 340B Rebate Pilot Enjoined Pending Appeal Introduction This First Circuit order arises from a high-stakes...
§3146 Failure-to-Appear Counts, When Grouped, Do Not Create “Double Counting” That Bars a §3C1.1 Obstruction Enhancement Case: United States v. Mello (1st Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) | Court: United States...
Digital-Evidence Drug-Quantity Extrapolation and No Double Counting Between § 3146 Failure-to-Appear and § 3C1.1 Obstruction Case: United States v. Mello (1st Cir. Jan. 7, 2026) | Court: United...
Pending Discovery Does Not Block Summary Judgment Absent Rule 56(d), and § 1983 Malicious Prosecution After a Warrant Requires a Franks-Style Falsehood or Omission 1. Introduction In Besosa-Noceda v....
Radfar v. Covino: Off-Duty Protective-Order Litigation Is Not “Color of Law,” a Stray Ethnic Slur Alone Won’t Prove Discriminatory Purpose, and Malicious Prosecution Requires an Initiated Criminal...